From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MQNHv-00057I-3T
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:17:55 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MQNHp-000564-43
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:17:53 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43291 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MQNHo-00055w-UE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:17:48 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:42237)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1MQNHo-0006mH-Ii
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:17:48 -0400
Message-ID: <4A5B4F9C.3090806@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:15:40 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] add strify() macros.
References: <1247478048-17257-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>	
	<1247478048-17257-3-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>	
	<4A5B3CB0.7070604@codemonkey.ws>
	<f43fc5580907130759u41fc56ber534a2dea82594293@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580907130759u41fc56ber534a2dea82594293@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

On 07/13/09 16:59, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 7/13/09, Anthony Liguori<anthony@codemonkey.ws>  wrote:
>>   #define strify_i(a) # a
>>   #define strify(a) strify_i(a)
>
> What's wrong with the almost identical stringify() macro?

Nothing, just havn't noticed it, fixing ...

cheers,
   Gerd