From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MRWEo-0001E8-Qu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:03:26 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MRWEk-0001Bc-1c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:03:26 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48352 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRWEj-0001BW-Qu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:03:21 -0400
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.244]:14495)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MRWEj-0005iR-7D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:03:21 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so60531rvf.22
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A5F7975.8020207@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:03:17 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/5] switch -drive to QemuOpts.
References: <1247756224-19219-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<1247756224-19219-6-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<4A5F5053.5000809@codemonkey.ws> <4A5F7789.8070500@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A5F7789.8070500@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Quick fix (incremental) attached.
> Oh, and a leftover debug line ...

Great, wait a day or two and please resend the series.

I've already gotten everything in staging for the 0.11 freeze.  I'm 
looking at pushing a tag later today after testing finishes.

One thing that bothers me is that there is a really high rate of change 
in the qdev stuff.  These series touch a lot of code and therefore cause 
quite a lot of conflicts.  That concerns me that the long term 
maintenance of stable-0.11 is going to be really painful.

So I'm thinking of making an exception for some of the more intrusive 
qdev changes and to continue pulling some of them in post freeze.  It 
would have to be handled on a case by case basis but I'm specifically 
thinking of things like the Property refactoring you just did.

What do you think?

> cheers,
>   Gerd
>

Regards,

Anthony Liguori