From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffman <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Introduce macro for defining qdev properties
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:11:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A60BEEF.2050601@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907171833.34167.paul@codesourcery.com>
Paul Brook wrote:
> I think I agree. Using GCC extensions for error checking (e.g. DO_UPCAST) or
> performance (__builtin_clz) is fine, but I'm a reluctant to rely on it for
> correct operation.
>
Practically speaking, we've never supported anything but GCC and I doubt
we ever will. In this case, it's an important part of something I'm
trying to fix about the current property system.
It seems very brittle to me. You have to specify a type in both the
state structure and in the property definition. Those two things are
very, very far apart in the code. Right now, the rules about type
compatible are ill defined which makes it more likely to break beyond
simple mistakes. For instance, uint32 is used for uint32_t, int32_t,
and int. That seems odd.
I also don't like the fact that we mix field type information with
display information. I haven't thought about the best solution to this
but I think it's either introducing new struct types or adding an
optional decorator parameter.
The system I'm aiming for looks like this:
typedef struct {
SysBusDevice parent;
/* public */
uint32_t queue_depth;
uint32_t tx_mitigation_delay;
CharDriverState *chr;
/* private */
...
} MyDeviceState;
static Property my_device_properties[] = {
QDEV_PROP(MyDeviceState, queue_depth),
QDEV_PROP(MyDeviceState, tx_mitigation_delay),
QDEV_PROP(MyDeviceState, chr),
{}
};
Where there's a connection between properties and device state fields
and there's no duplicate type information. That means that for the most
part, the rules of type compatible can be ignored by most users.
I'd like to see most uses of QDEV_PROP_NAME eliminated by renaming
variables and accepting '-' in place of '_'. We'll always need a way to
accept default values.
I'm not sure how to do this without GCC extensions. We could
potentially add macro decorators and use a sparse-like tool to extract
property lists automatically from device state.
--
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-17 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 14:41 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Introduce macros for setting properties Anthony Liguori
2009-07-17 14:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Introduce CharDriverState qdev property type Anthony Liguori
2009-07-21 14:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-21 14:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-21 15:03 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-21 15:14 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-21 15:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-21 15:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-21 15:47 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-22 9:48 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-17 14:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Introduce macro for defining qdev properties Anthony Liguori
2009-07-17 17:23 ` Blue Swirl
2009-07-17 17:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-17 17:33 ` Paul Brook
2009-07-17 18:11 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-07-17 18:32 ` Blue Swirl
2009-07-17 20:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-17 22:58 ` Paul Brook
2009-07-18 12:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-18 16:13 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-20 2:29 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-21 8:30 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A60BEEF.2050601@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).