qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffman <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Introduce macro for defining qdev properties
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:11:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A60BEEF.2050601@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907171833.34167.paul@codesourcery.com>

Paul Brook wrote:
> I think I agree. Using GCC extensions for error checking (e.g. DO_UPCAST) or 
> performance (__builtin_clz) is fine, but I'm a reluctant to rely on it for 
> correct operation.
>   
Practically speaking, we've never supported anything but GCC and I doubt 
we ever will.  In this case, it's an important part of something I'm 
trying to fix about the current property system.

It seems very brittle to me.  You have to specify a type in both the 
state structure and in the property definition.  Those two things are 
very, very far apart in the code.  Right now, the rules about type 
compatible are ill defined which makes it more likely to break beyond 
simple mistakes.  For instance, uint32 is used for uint32_t, int32_t, 
and int.  That seems odd.

I also don't like the fact that we mix field type information with 
display information.  I haven't thought about the best solution to this 
but I think it's either introducing new struct types or adding an 
optional decorator parameter.

The system I'm aiming for looks like this:

typedef struct {
   SysBusDevice parent;

   /* public */
   uint32_t queue_depth;
   uint32_t tx_mitigation_delay;
   CharDriverState *chr;

   /* private */
   ...
} MyDeviceState;

static Property my_device_properties[] = {
  QDEV_PROP(MyDeviceState, queue_depth),
  QDEV_PROP(MyDeviceState, tx_mitigation_delay),
  QDEV_PROP(MyDeviceState, chr),
  {}
};

Where there's a connection between properties and device state fields 
and there's no duplicate type information.  That means that for the most 
part, the rules of type compatible can be ignored by most users.

I'd like to see most uses of QDEV_PROP_NAME eliminated by renaming 
variables and accepting '-' in place of '_'.  We'll always need a way to 
accept default values.

I'm not sure how to do this without GCC extensions.  We could 
potentially add macro decorators and use a sparse-like tool to extract 
property lists automatically from device state.

-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-17 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-17 14:41 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Introduce macros for setting properties Anthony Liguori
2009-07-17 14:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Introduce CharDriverState qdev property type Anthony Liguori
2009-07-21 14:46   ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-21 14:53     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-21 15:03       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-21 15:14         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-21 15:23         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-21 15:34           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-21 15:47             ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-22  9:48               ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-17 14:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Introduce macro for defining qdev properties Anthony Liguori
2009-07-17 17:23   ` Blue Swirl
2009-07-17 17:26     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-17 17:33     ` Paul Brook
2009-07-17 18:11       ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-07-17 18:32         ` Blue Swirl
2009-07-17 20:05           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-17 22:58             ` Paul Brook
2009-07-18 12:43               ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-18 16:13                 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-20  2:29                   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-21  8:30   ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A60BEEF.2050601@us.ibm.com \
    --to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).