From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTYCY-000126-RC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:33:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTYCT-000114-CA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:33:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55879 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTYCT-000111-4T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:33:25 -0400 Received: from gecko.sbs.de ([194.138.37.40]:21440) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTYCS-0002AP-Gl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:33:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4A66DCE1.9060802@siemens.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:33:21 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090721143936.GA18061@amd.home.annexia.org> <4A65FD5B.6050509@siemens.com> <20090721161642.GA18957@amd.home.annexia.org> <4A65EAB6.3060006@siemens.com> <20090721192311.GG9230@amd.home.annexia.org> <4A664BF4.3040404@web.de> <20090722084237.GA23948@amd.home.annexia.org> <20090722090512.GA24137@amd.home.annexia.org> In-Reply-To: <20090722090512.GA24137@amd.home.annexia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: guestfwd option doesn't allow supplementary , server, nowait List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Richard W.M. Jones" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > No this is wrong - the "0.10.5" in Fedora Rawhide is a strange > combination of qemu and KVM bits. I just checked out the real > stable-0.10 branch from qemu git and tried that and it's OK. > > Anyway ... It doesn't work in qemu git, which concerns me. > When you said: > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 01:15:00AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> That commit is not from stable, but from 0.11 (and it is expected to >>> introduce the regression for that series). > > What do you mean by "it is expected to introduce the regression"? You > mean that guestfwd is supposed to not work? I mean that, now that we know there is a regression, it is most likely that it comes from this patch which switches from the old "-net channel" code to the wrapped version over the new syntax. But I definitely not planned to break anything here. :) Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux