From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MTgc4-0005zs-7q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:32:24 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MTgbz-0005tz-BR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:32:23 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58696 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTgby-0005tj-DT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:32:19 -0400
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.150]:23365)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MTgby-000809-4u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:32:18 -0400
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so193348qwc.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A67594C.7080908@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:24:12 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1247858024.git.quintela@redhat.com>	<4A670CA3.6030800@codemonkey.ws>
	<4A674082.8070405@gnu.org>	<m3ws60d574.fsf@neno.mitica>
	<4A6755D7.8060101@codemonkey.ws> <m3iqhkd1ii.fsf@neno.mitica>
In-Reply-To: <m3iqhkd1ii.fsf@neno.mitica>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/37] Generate a proper LIBS variable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Juan Quintela wrote:
> Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>   
>> Juan Quintela wrote:
>>     
>>> Anthony, what do you think of merging a search path like this:
>>>
>>> /usr/local/lib64;/lib64;/usr/lib64;/usr/local/lib;/lib;/usr/lib
>>>
>>> This seems more similar to the one that my linker has.
>>>
>>> Patch sent as new thread.
>>>   
>>>       
>> I'd rather see the us generate a config-host.ld that contained the
>> output of ld --verbose -v | grep SEARCH_DIR and then do:
>>     
>
> Only for x86_64 or all architectures?  Once here.
>   

For all I would think.  My only concern is that we'll break non-GNU ld's 
but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori