From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVQ4m-0006dY-M9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:17:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVQ4j-0006cZ-3C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:17:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42688 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVQ4i-0006cN-LD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:17:08 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:43694) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVQ4i-0004mg-5w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:17:08 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6RDBZbu016764 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:11:35 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n6RDH4mS246028 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:17:04 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6RDH4j7000980 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:17:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4A6DA8CE.9070108@us.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:17:02 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1248468005-13907-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1248468005-13907-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] RFC: use logging count for individual regions List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Glauber Costa wrote: > qemu-kvm use this scheme of logging count of individual regions, > which is, IMHO, more flexible which the one we have right now. > I'm proposing we use it. > > Anthony, please don't apply this patch yet, as I would want it > to receive proper testing, and FYI, current migration broken ;( > - and I don't really have time to go debug it now. > FYI, if you use [RFC] in your subject, it will guarantee the patch doesn't make it into staging. But I'll make sure not to apply this. -- Regards, Anthony Liguori