From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVQqX-0007K2-3d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:06:33 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVQqR-0007IR-7p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:06:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42520 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVQqQ-0007IB-I7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:06:26 -0400 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:56804 helo=mail.wrs.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVQqP-0007Al-QF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:06:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4A6DB447.7030001@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:05:59 -0500 From: Jason Wessel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Sparc64: convert APB to qdev References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: Paul Brook , qemu-devel Blue Swirl wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Igor > Kovalenko wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> >>> I have a problem with APB conversion to qdev. For some reason, with >>> the patch applied, PCI config register access changes and OpenBIOS >>> can't find any PCI devices. >>> >> You are using pci_host_data_* which expects opaque pointer to PCIHostState, >> so you need to pass appropriate opaque to cpu_register_io_memory. >> With this small amendment I verified there are no changes to qemu.log and >> serial console output. >> > > Great, thanks! > > >> Not sure if this requires sign-off :) >> > > Good question, perhaps the SoB experts should clarify the policy. > > But in this case it makes no sense to commit my broken version and > then your patch. I think I'll just give you credit in the message for > the fixed commit. > > If you are looking for some kind of standard to follow based on the linux kernel use, the document is: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/SubmittingPatches;hb=HEAD The example given shows a maintainer cleaning up someone else's patch for merge. 347 Signed-off-by: Random J Developer 348 [lucky@maintainer.example.org: struct foo moved from foo.c to foo.h] 349 Signed-off-by: Lucky K Maintainer The pattern is no different if you fold 1 or more patches together. The credit can go in the bracket section. Akpm does this a lot if you wanted to search the linux kernel for any other examples. linux-2.6.git % git log |grep "\[akpm" |wc -l 1276 Cheers, Jason.