From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVWqw-0008JV-Is for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:31:22 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVWqr-0008Hn-T6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:31:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37925 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVWqr-0008Hk-Pm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:31:17 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:36263) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVWqr-0003Nl-74 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:31:17 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6RKNsKQ000891 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:23:54 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n6RKVGFf244046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:31:16 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6RKVGYV003444 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:31:16 -0400 Message-ID: <4A6E0E92.2030405@us.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:31:14 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] fix endless look at kvm migration References: <1248719202-24401-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <4A6DF5AB.6000608@web.de> <20090727202134.GL4776@poweredge.glommer> <20090727172251.39a000c2@doriath> <20090727203617.GM4776@poweredge.glommer> In-Reply-To: <20090727203617.GM4776@poweredge.glommer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: Alexander Graf , Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino Glauber Costa wrote: > Just that I don't see a point. Reverting a patch is a matter of doing > a "git revert " > > That's up to the maintainer to do. And btw, I totally forgot that we're > in qemu list here ;-) It's Anthony, not avi. > I already did in my local tree. Just doing a full rebuild to test... -- Regards, Anthony Liguori