From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVXtg-00078u-IE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:38:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVXtd-00075X-0Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:38:16 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33235 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVXtc-00075U-Qi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:38:12 -0400 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:42950) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVXtc-0002Vs-AW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:38:12 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6RLc7xe010128 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:38:07 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n6RLatVA212288 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:36:55 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6RLatdQ010292 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:36:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4A6E1DF5.7090704@us.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:36:53 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090727201855.GK4776@poweredge.glommer> <1248729471-5403-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20090727212923.GO4776@poweredge.glommer> In-Reply-To: <20090727212923.GO4776@poweredge.glommer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH alternative] fix migration to obey -S List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Glauber Costa wrote: > Hummm,, those are a little bit weird. I'd expect it to be a characteristic of the > source machine, no the destination. IOW, if the machine was running prior to migration, > it should be running after it, and if it was stopped prior to migration, it should be > stopped after it. > Whether a guest is running is not part of it's state-IOW, it's not visible to the guest whether it's running or not. -- Regards, Anthony Liguori