From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MVZ8u-0003xD-Hb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:58:04 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MVZ8p-0003vo-R5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:58:04 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56482 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVZ8p-0003vl-NH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:57:59 -0400
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:9229)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1MVZ8p-0005de-6e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:57:59 -0400
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so937159fgb.8
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A6E30F2.4080403@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:57:54 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1248726105.git.quintela@redhat.com>	<874e96d24ad01cfaf930a55ed96119d3f5e2da53.1248726105.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0907280101390.3551@linmac.oyster.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0907280101390.3551@linmac.oyster.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/4] Use proper struct initializers and
 remove INIT_FIELD() macro
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

On 07/27/2009 11:03 PM, malc wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> This patch is pointless.

I'd say it's pointless to conditionalize 1 usage of a feature out of 100.

Paolo