From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVuiF-0008KM-To for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:59:59 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVuiA-0008Cd-6R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:59:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50918 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVuiA-0008CX-01 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:59:54 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.242]:22443) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVui9-0007dE-F8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:59:53 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so81757rvf.22 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A6F74D3.5080405@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:59:47 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bug report + fix: e1000.c in 0.10.5 does not properly emulate real hardware References: <200906081848.39468.wpaul@windriver.com> <20090609145906.GA9134@amd.home.annexia.org> <200906091243.09093.wpaul@windriver.com> <200907281417.32928.wpaul@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <200907281417.32928.wpaul@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bill Paul Cc: "Richard W.M. Jones" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Bill Paul wrote: > Hi guys: > > I submitted a patch for e1000.c a while ago, to fix issues with the ICS and > EERD registers not being emulated properly, which I discovered while testing > QEMU with VxWorks. I provided binary VxWorks images and a bootable bootrom > floppy that works with QEMU for testing, but so far I haven't heard anything > further on this issue. I looked at the git repository, and it doesn't look > like the patch I submitted has been applied yet. > > Does anyone have an update on this? Just checking to make sure the patch > doesn't fall through the cracks. > I see you sent out a version with a Signed-off-by, but you didn't send it as a top-level patch. Please resend it as a top level patch (a new subject starting with [PATCH]) and that will get the ball rolling. Regards, Anthony Liguori > -Bill > >