From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Bill Paul <wpaul@windriver.com>
Cc: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bug report + fix: e1000.c in 0.10.5 does not properly emulate real hardware
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:54:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A6F81AD.1040803@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907281521.12322.wpaul@windriver.com>
Bill Paul wrote:
> Let me make sure I understand correctly.
>
> You must have my previous e-mail with the patch in front of you, with the
> attached unified diff. Are you saying that rather than just taking that
> unidiff, from the e-mail I already sent, you want me to send you exactly the
> same file, only with a different subject line that starts with [PATCH]?
>
Yes.
> I'd like to point out that a) while this may be part of some standardized
> project etiquette, I've yet to see these required steps clearly spelled out
> anywhere,
Yes, we're definitely overdue for a SubmittingPatches file to live in
the tree. I suggested that you follow these steps not due to any sort
of desire to follow arbitrary procedures but because it guarantees your
patch will get attention.
> and b) why can't you just take the diff I already sent and
> apply/test/molest/etc it now that you have it?
>
Well first, it's against 0.10.5 which means there's nothing to apply it
to. It has to be against our development tree. Second, a system scales
better when you push work down to the outer most nodes. It's easier for
to have you resubmit a patch and have everyone follow the same
procedures than to have me manually extract individual patches from
random threads, tweak them to apply to git, etc.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-28 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-09 1:48 [Qemu-devel] bug report + fix: e1000.c in 0.10.5 does not properly emulate real hardware Bill Paul
2009-06-09 2:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-06-09 3:39 ` Bill Paul
2009-06-09 14:59 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-06-09 19:42 ` Bill Paul
2009-07-28 21:17 ` Bill Paul
2009-07-28 21:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-28 22:21 ` Bill Paul
2009-07-28 22:54 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-07-29 18:09 ` Bill Paul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A6F81AD.1040803@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=wpaul@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).