From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWERh-0005eL-AS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:04:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWERc-0005c8-JM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:04:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52838 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWERc-0005c5-93 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:04:08 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:36176) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MWERa-0007ss-TA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:04:08 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6TIwWGo004470 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:58:32 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n6TJ44Gm250232 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:04:04 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6TJ446S012109 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:04:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4A709D22.1010604@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:04:02 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add --accel option References: <1248814081-7860-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <200907291952.23714.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200907291952.23714.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: Glauber Costa , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paul Brook wrote: > On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Glauber Costa wrote: > >> Since libvirt dudes seem to prefer it, add a --accel option. For now, >> it only does the same as --enable-kvm, but it can easily be extended >> in the future. It also accepts "none" and "kqemu" options. >> > > Having two options do the same thing seems wrong. IMO at least one of them > should be deprecated and documented as a backward compatibility alias. > Yup. --enable-kvm/--enable-kqemu/--kernel-kqemu should all be deprecated and documented as such. -- Regards, Anthony Liguori