From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWRt8-0002qQ-1N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:25:26 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWRt3-0002oK-5o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:25:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35869 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWRt3-0002oF-2z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:25:21 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f207.google.com ([209.85.220.207]:39524) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MWRt2-00077J-FH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:25:20 -0400 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so871315fxm.8 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4A7166FA.9070401@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:25:14 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4A7144A6.5060704@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 30/42] Rename CPPFLAGS to CFLAGS List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Tell that to sdl-config --cflags and friends :p But sdl-config and friends do not give out anything that the compiler cares about but not the preprocessor (such as weird -f or -m options). Anyway... > If there is an agreement about that, I don't care remaining. As things > stand now, the difference between CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS in qemu was > artificial. ... agreed, that's why I don't care if you call it CPPFLAGS or QEMU_CFLAGS or QEMU_CPPFLAGS. I just want to preserve the distinction between flags the user may want to override (optimization, debugging), and flags the user should leave alone. Paolo