From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWgDh-0002Hb-00 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:43:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWgDc-0002HG-CH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:43:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57934 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWgDc-0002HD-9A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:43:32 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:46740) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MWgDb-0005wC-U7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:43:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4A723E2F.7070504@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:43:27 +0200 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: tracking qemu-devel at patchwork.ozlabs.org References: <20090729090431.GA4438@redhat.com> <200907300852.37643.jk@ozlabs.org> <20090730123427.GA17306@redhat.com> <200907310941.37221.jk@ozlabs.org> In-Reply-To: <200907310941.37221.jk@ozlabs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jeremy Kerr Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" On 31.07.2009 01:41, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Michael, > >> Is everything in order? >> > > Should be - forward me one of the patches that has been through the list > (headers intact) and I'll make sure I've got the header checks right. > AFAIK patchwork ignores all mails without Message-ID. That's IMHO a feature which other projects (flashrom, coreboot) rely on for their patchwork installation because commit mails often don't have such an ID and are thus ignored automatically. No idea if this was the case here, but I just wanted to mention one possible reason for unlisted patches. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/