[Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 broken on OpenBSD.

[Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 broken on OpenBSD.

[Brad]

Trying to compile QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 on OpenBSD/i386 it is broken at the
moment..

gmake[1]: Entering directory 
`/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-bios/optionrom'
cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -I/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1 -fno-stack-protector -o 
multiboot.o -c multiboot.S
multiboot.S: Assembler messages:
multiboot.S:116: Error: `%es:-4(%edi)' is not a valid 16 bit base/index 
expression
gmake[1]: *** [multiboot.o] Error 1

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 broken on OpenBSD.

[Anthony Liguori]

Brad wrote:
> Trying to compile QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 on OpenBSD/i386 it is broken at the
> moment..
>
> gmake[1]: Entering directory 
> `/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-bios/optionrom'
> cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -I/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1 -fno-stack-protector -o 
>   

Is cc not gcc?

> multiboot.o -c multiboot.S
> multiboot.S: Assembler messages:
> multiboot.S:116: Error: `%es:-4(%edi)' is not a valid 16 bit base/index 
>   

Yeah, that does look suspicious.  I think:

movl %ecx, %es:-4(%di)

Would be more correct.  Alex?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 broken on OpenBSD.

[Brad]

On Monday 03 August 2009 15:24:09 Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Brad wrote:
> > Trying to compile QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 on OpenBSD/i386 it is broken at the
> > moment..
> >
> > gmake[1]: Entering directory
> > `/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-bio
> >s/optionrom' cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer
> > -fno-builtin
> > -I/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1
> > -fno-stack-protector -o
>
> Is cc not gcc?

No.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 broken on OpenBSD.

[Alexander Graf]

On 03.08.2009, at 21:24, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> Brad wrote:
>> Trying to compile QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 on OpenBSD/i386 it is broken at the
>> moment..
>>
>> gmake[1]: Entering directory `/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w- 
>> qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-bios/optionrom'
>> cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer -fno- 
>> builtin -I/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/ 
>> qemu-0.11.0-rc1 -fno-stack-protector -o
>
> Is cc not gcc?
>
>> multiboot.o -c multiboot.S
>> multiboot.S: Assembler messages:
>> multiboot.S:116: Error: `%es:-4(%edi)' is not a valid 16 bit base/ 
>> index
>
> Yeah, that does look suspicious.  I think:
>
> movl %ecx, %es:-4(%di)
>
> Would be more correct.  Alex?

Looks the same to me, yeah.

Boy, the more I see PowerPC assembly the less I like x86 :-).

Alex

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 broken on OpenBSD.

[Brad]

On Monday 03 August 2009 15:24:09 Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Brad wrote:
> > Trying to compile QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 on OpenBSD/i386 it is broken at the
> > moment..
> >
> > gmake[1]: Entering directory
> > `/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-bio
> >s/optionrom' cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer
> > -fno-builtin
> > -I/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1
> > -fno-stack-protector -o
>
> Is cc not gcc?
>
> > multiboot.o -c multiboot.S
> > multiboot.S: Assembler messages:
> > multiboot.S:116: Error: `%es:-4(%edi)' is not a valid 16 bit base/index
>
> Yeah, that does look suspicious.  I think:
>
> movl %ecx, %es:-4(%di)
>
> Would be more correct.  Alex?
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori

Gets a bit further along..

gmake[1]: Entering directory 
`/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-bios/optionrom'
cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -I/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1 -fno-stack-protector -o 
multiboot.o -c multiboot.S
ld -Ttext 0 -e _start -s -o multiboot.img multiboot.o
objcopy -O binary -j .text multiboot.img multiboot.raw
/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-bios/optionrom/signrom.sh 
multiboot.raw multiboot.bin
od: unknown option -- A
od: od(1) has been deprecated for hexdump(1).
usage: od [-aBbcDdeFfHhIiLlOovXx] [-j offset] [-N length] [-t type_string]
        [[+]offset[.][Bb]] [file ...]
/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-bios/optionrom/signrom.sh[31]:   
* 512 - 1 : unexpected `*'
gmake[1]: *** [multiboot.bin] Error 1

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 broken on OpenBSD.

[Anthony Liguori]

Brad wrote:
> On Monday 03 August 2009 15:24:09 Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> Brad wrote:
>>     
>>> Trying to compile QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 on OpenBSD/i386 it is broken at the
>>> moment..
>>>
>>> gmake[1]: Entering directory
>>> `/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-bio
>>> s/optionrom' cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer
>>> -fno-builtin
>>> -I/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1
>>> -fno-stack-protector -o
>>>       
>> Is cc not gcc?
>>     
>
> No.
>   

Too many negatives.  Is cc gcc?  If not, are you building QEMU with 
whatever cc is or do we have an error in our Makefiles such that $(CC) 
isn't getting propagated to the multiboot Makefile?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 broken on OpenBSD.

[Brad]

On Monday 03 August 2009 20:49:09 Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Brad wrote:
> > On Monday 03 August 2009 15:24:09 Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Brad wrote:
> >>> Trying to compile QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 on OpenBSD/i386 it is broken at the
> >>> moment..
> >>>
> >>> gmake[1]: Entering directory
> >>> `/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-b
> >>>io s/optionrom' cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror
> >>> -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin
> >>> -I/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1
> >>> -fno-stack-protector -o
> >>
> >> Is cc not gcc?
> >
> > No.
>
> Too many negatives.  Is cc gcc?  If not, are you building QEMU with
> whatever cc is or do we have an error in our Makefiles such that $(CC)
> isn't getting propagated to the multiboot Makefile?

Yes, it is.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.