From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaxvW-0001Vi-Th for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:26:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaxvR-0001VS-OV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:26:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46314 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaxvR-0001VP-Jk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:26:29 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f188.google.com ([209.85.210.188]:59519) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaxvR-0003FK-Cg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:26:29 -0400 Received: by yxe26 with SMTP id 26so5131143yxe.4 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A81D3F1.1040300@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:26:25 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Intel 8255x/eepro100 compatibility patches References: <20090809211433.GA8892@1und1.de> <20090811182744.GA7045@1und1.de> In-Reply-To: <20090811182744.GA7045@1und1.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Reimar_D=F6ffinger?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Reimar Döffinger wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 11:14:33PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > >> Attached is a series of patches that makes things work with at least >> some version of that (sorry, I only tried some binary I found on the >> net, didn't compile from source). >> In addition, I also used the documentation from here: >> http://www.intel.com/design/network/manuals/8255X_OpenSDM.htm >> > > Another change, currently if the hardware runs out of receive buffers qemu > crashes with an assert. > Simply setting the RU state to "no resources" seems to work (though it > is hard to provoke the situation and thus hard to test well), at least > it can't be any worse than crashing due to an assert (IMO)... > Please send this as a series of patches with each patch in an email. Regards, Anthony Liguori