From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbBFo-0003nP-9P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:40:24 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbBFj-0003me-E9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:40:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53829 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MbBFj-0003mT-2Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:40:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:40690) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbBFi-0006Dc-GM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:40:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4A829C0B.3070705@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:40:11 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk/qdev failure in the current git tree References: <20090810235646.GA12872@lst.de> <4A80BB6B.3020001@codemonkey.ws> <20090811161302.GA2053@lst.de> <20090811163638.GA4891@lst.de> <4A81C669.8070300@redhat.com> <4A828ABF.1040306@redhat.com> <4A8292DB.9000609@redhat.com> <4A82973A.5070005@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4A82973A.5070005@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Christoph Hellwig , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 08/12/09 12:19, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 08/12/09 12:00, Avi Kivity wrote: >> What about qemu-kvm.git (and its bios)? > > Works: > > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:06.0[A] -> Link [LNKB] -> GSI 10 (level, > high) -> IRQ 10 From boot log diff: --- qemu.log 2009-08-12 12:26:30.000000000 +0200 +++ kvm.log 2009-08-12 12:20:22.000000000 +0200 @@ -26,21 +26,43 @@ ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0xb008 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) -Processor #0 6:2 APIC version 17 +Processor #0 6:2 APIC version 20 Where does this come from? kernel vs. userspace apic? +ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x01] disabled) +ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x02] disabled) [ more of these ] For hotplug cpus I guess? ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) +ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 5 global_irq 5 high level) +ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level) +ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 10 global_irq 10 high level) +ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 11 global_irq 11 high level) ACPI: IRQ0 used by override. ACPI: IRQ2 used by override. +ACPI: IRQ5 used by override. ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. +ACPI: IRQ10 used by override. +ACPI: IRQ11 used by override. !!! ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT] -ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 *11 12) -ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *9 10 11 12) -ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 *11 12) -ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *9 10 11 12) +ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 5 *10 11) +ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 5 *10 11) +ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 5 10 *11) +ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 5 10 *11) !!! That indeed looks like a bunch of changes and/or fixes did not find the way to upstream qemu ... cheers, Gerd