From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbFo5-0004HT-BP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:32:05 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbFo0-0004EQ-QF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:32:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42623 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MbFo0-0004EK-MW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:32:00 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:54714 helo=relay.sgi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbFo0-0001J3-Ck for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:32:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4A82E06C.8090800@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:31:56 +0200 From: Jes Sorensen MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4A7ADE70.7060204@sgi.com> <4A806D86.8090208@codemonkey.ws> <4A8156D4.2090000@sgi.com> <4A817B61.2010803@redhat.com> <4A818415.8020706@sgi.com> <4A81D666.2010404@redhat.com> <4A82D4E4.90200@sgi.com> <4A82D8B1.7000402@redhat.com> <4A82DB7C.6090906@sgi.com> <4A82DFA3.4090903@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4A82DFA3.4090903@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] isa_reserve_irq() List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel , Gleb Natapov On 08/12/2009 05:28 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hmm, I don't think it makes sense to pull a dummy device out of thin > air, isa_reserve_irq() will do fine. But it should be be clearly > documented that this is for this special case and not-yet converted > devices. qdev-ified devices should use the other isa_*_irq functions > instead. Ok - do you want me to update the documentation, or is it fine as is then? Cheers, Jes