qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] Make the e1000 the default network adapter for the pc target.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:57:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A95070A.4060906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ab1nir24.fsf_-_@nemi.mork.no>

On 08/25/2009 11:20 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>  writes:
>    
>> On 08/25/2009 04:23 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> I use e1000 with win xp, although win xp has no driver at all for the
>>> e1000 and requires you to download the intel driver and install that.
>>> The intel driver also made win 2003 work before even though the microsoft
>>> supplied driver did not work.
>>>        
>> Ok.  IMO it's important for networking to work out of the box, so we
>> should avoid e1000 as default.
>>      
> I don't think you can buy a new PC with a NIC supported out of the box
> by Windows XP.

rtl8139 works out of the box.

> That doesn't seem to bother the PC manufacturers...
>    

I'm sure it bothers users.

> The e1000 works very well in Windows XP, given that you install the
> driver from Intel.  And e1000 is certainly more common and better
> supported than ne2k in more *modern* OSes.
>
> I fully agree with Anthony:
>   "the average user is better served with an e1000 vs ne2k."
>
> But this of course boils down to a discussion about who the average user
> is.  Anyone having any statistics on that?
>
> Anyway, most people will know that they may need driver disks when
> installing ancient OSes on modern computers.  With QEMU they even have
> the option to change the hardware with a flip of a command line.
>
> The ne2k default is misleading.  A common assumption is that developers
> know best, and that you need a good reason to change their defaults.
> This may trick people into thinking that the ne2k is the best NIC choice
> for QEMU. And I think everyone here agrees that it is not anymore.
>    

The best choice for Windows XP is virtio, but we sure won't be making 
that the default.  Given that e1000 gives 0 Mb/sec out of the box, I 
think it's clear that rtl8139 is better.  If people are interested in 
performance, they can change the default and download a driver (e1000 or 
virtio).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-26  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-14 16:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Make the e1000 the default network adapter for the pc target Anthony Liguori
2009-08-15 21:58 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] Make the e1000 the default network adapterfor " Sebastian Herbszt
2009-08-17 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Make the e1000 the default network adapter for " Mark McLoughlin
2009-08-24 15:12   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-24 15:36     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-24 16:14       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-25 10:45 ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 12:39   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-25 15:55     ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 13:23   ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-08-25 13:34     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-25 14:23       ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-08-25 16:00       ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 15:58     ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 16:30       ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-08-25 16:39         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-25 16:56           ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 17:11             ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-08-25 17:13               ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 18:19                 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-26  8:32                   ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 17:28               ` Reimar Döffinger
2009-08-26  5:47           ` Amit Shah
2009-08-25 20:20       ` [Qemu-devel] " Bjørn Mork
2009-08-26  9:57         ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-08-25 13:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Weil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A95070A.4060906@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=bjorn@mork.no \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).