From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Order concurrent AIO requests on the same unallocated cluster
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:19:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9CF517.30701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1251730129-18693-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
On 08/31/2009 05:48 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> When two AIO requests write to the same cluster, and this cluster is
> unallocated, currently both requests allocate a new cluster and the second one
> merges the first one when it is completed. This means an cluster allocation, a
> read and a cluster deallocation which cause some overhead. If we simply let the
> second request wait until the first one is done, we improve overall performance
> with AIO requests (specifially, qcow2/virtio combinations).
>
> This patch maintains a list of in-flight requests that have allocated new
> clusters. A second request touching the same cluster is limited so that it
> either doesn't touch the allocation of the first request (so it can have a
> non-overlapping allocation) or it waits for the first request to complete.
>
Can't this cause an even/odd pattern where all even-numbered requests
run first, then all the odd-numbered requests?
(0 goes to disk, 1 depends on it, 2 depends on 1, which isn't allocating
now, so it goes to disk, 3 depends on 2, ...)
Do you have performance numbers?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 14:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Order concurrent AIO requests on the same unallocated cluster Kevin Wolf
2009-09-01 10:19 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-09-01 10:50 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-09-01 11:24 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-01 11:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-09-01 12:29 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-09-01 12:53 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-01 13:15 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-09-01 11:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-09-01 11:55 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9CF517.30701@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).