qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC 0/5] Improve device info handling
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:42:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9EA05F.50100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580909020741y6453fd6bvfcccdcf509b52106@mail.gmail.com>

   Hi,

>> The qdev root is the main_system_bus right now, I don't see a need to change
>> that.  All core devices (cpus, memory, pic, ...) can be children of the main
>> system bus.
>
> That level is too low, because the metamachine level would not be
> interested in the internals of the pc device (except generic
> parameters like memory, number of CPUs etc), but how it connects to
> the host devices.

IMO the connection to the host device belongs to the guest device which 
needs the link.  i.e. the scsi-disk driver should handle that, not some 
metamachine.

>> We have to clearly separate between host state and guest state.
>> qdev is about guest state.
>
> Yes, it's about guest state _now_, but why limit it to that? But if
> host devices as a class are really different from guest device, we
> could have something similar to qdev but for host devices. I still
> don't see a need for a special type.

There are a number of differences.  guest devices belong to a emulated 
bus (ide/pci/usb/scsi/whatever).  host devices don't.  guest devices 
form a device tree.  host devices are simple flat lists.

It might make sense to create something simliar to qdev for the host 
devices.

>> A disk has two sides:  The host side (virtual drive foo is a lvm volume in
>> raw format / a file in qcow2 format / a iso image / whatever else) and the
>> guest side (this virtual drive is a master ide disk / scsi disk with id 3 /
>> virtio disk / ...).  Only the later is represented by qdev.  The link
>> between the two is a property.
>
> There is no need for a link. Instead of the property stuff, the pc
> qdev should make available mappable objects (drive placeholders),

The pc qdev doesn't know which "mappable objects" exist.  The knowledge 
is scattered all over the devices (ide / scsi / virtio-blk / usb-storage 
/ ...).  And not all of them are present in all configurations.

> the
> metamachine would plug in the host drives by mapping the drive to a
> host drive. It's just like device vs. address: drive placeholder vs.
> host drive.

It works the other way around:  We have a linked list of host drives 
(with names).  guest drives have a property, setting the property will 
lookup the host drive by name (only virtio-blk is merged, patches for 
scsi-disk & usb-storage are on the list).

> Consider vlan:
>     DeviceState *gdev, *hdev, *vlan;
>     VLAN *gvlan, *hvlan;
>
>     hdev = qdev_create(NULL, "host");
>     qdev_init(hdev);
>
>     gdev = qdev_create(NULL, "pc");
>     qdev_init(gdev);
>
>     vlan = qdev_create(NULL, "vlan");
>     qdev_init(gdev);
>     gvlan = qdev_get_vlan_in(gdev, 0); // Analogous to gpio

Same problem as with the drives: pc doesn't handle vlans, the nic driver 
somewhere down the device tree does.

cheers,
   Gerd

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-02 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-29 14:06 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC 0/5] Improve device info handling Blue Swirl
2009-08-31  8:12 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-31 15:23   ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-01  7:54     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-09-01 16:21       ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-02  6:35         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-09-02 14:41           ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-02 16:42             ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2009-09-02 17:53               ` Blue Swirl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A9EA05F.50100@redhat.com \
    --to=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).