From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MlMFg-0003Cn-EC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:26:20 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MlMFb-00037v-8z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:26:19 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45276 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlMFb-00037o-0l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:26:15 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9327)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1MlMFZ-0008UA-MA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:26:14 -0400
Message-ID: <4AA79EA2.3070002@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:25:06 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?
References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>
	<20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Bernhard Kauer <kauer@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi Bernhard,

Am 09.09.2009 14:18, schrieb Bernhard Kauer:
> Its wednesday again, time to resend a patch to the list.
> Until today the following happened in this endless story:
> 
> 	1. I wrote an RTC driver according to the manual which works on real hardware but not on Qemu.
> 	2. I traced the bug back to the first public version of Bochs. Its seems to be also
> 	   present in all derived version: Qemu, KVM, Xen, VBox...
> 	3. I send a patch to the Qemu list at least 4 times.
> 	4. I never got a single response to my patch.
> 
> Thus I have to assume that device models in Qemu are unmaintained: further resending 
> does not make any sense in this case.
> 
> I still hope somebody will step up and take a stake in this story.  Otherwise Qemu
> will be more and more unusable.  For me and probably others.

The patch seems to be in Anthony's queue at least (see
http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git), so it might be committed
the next time he pushes.

Kevin