From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MlMmu-00063R-8Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:00:40 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MlMmo-00062K-6m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:00:38 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33548 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlMmm-00061v-SM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:00:33 -0400
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.144]:21050)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MlMmm-0005Eu-Gh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:00:32 -0400
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so1042584qwc.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:00:28 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?
References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>
	<20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Bernhard Kauer <kauer@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Bernhard Kauer wrote:
> Its wednesday again, time to resend a patch to the list.
> Until today the following happened in this endless story:
>   

Really, the whining just makes me want to drop your patch..

The first patch you sent didn't have [PATCH] in the subject.  There are 
hundreds of mails that are sent to the list every day.  If you don't 
mark a patch in a way that allows automatic filtering, it will get dropped.

When you resent, you did include [PATCH].  That patch made it into my 
staging tree.  See http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git.  We had 
a holiday this past weekend so I'm a little slow in flushing that queue 
to master.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori