From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlNUz-0002gs-Os for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:46:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlNUu-0002fF-J2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:46:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57450 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlNUu-0002f8-Ch for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:46:08 -0400 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.145]:20575) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlNUt-0006M2-6e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:46:07 -0400 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so1058108qwc.4 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:45:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AA7B193.5090309@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:45:55 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained? References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws> <20090909132657.GB22885@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20090909132657.GB22885@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov Cc: Bernhard Kauer , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:00:28AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Bernhard Kauer wrote: >> >>> Its wednesday again, time to resend a patch to the list. >>> Until today the following happened in this endless story: >>> >> Really, the whining just makes me want to drop your patch.. >> >> The first patch you sent didn't have [PATCH] in the subject. There >> are hundreds of mails that are sent to the list every day. If you >> don't mark a patch in a way that allows automatic filtering, it will >> get dropped. >> >> When you resent, you did include [PATCH]. That patch made it into >> my staging tree. See http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git. >> We had a holiday this past weekend so I'm a little slow in flushing >> that queue to master. >> >> > It would be really nice to get mail that your patch was applied to staging. > Casual contributor don't know that there is staging tree that should be > checked or separate mailing list that he should subscribe too. > I would like to use patchworks for this but I haven't figured out a sane way to integrate it into my workflow yet. Regards, Anthony Liguori > -- > Gleb. >