From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MlkB1-00020N-U6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:59:07 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MlkAw-0001yb-Ij
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:59:06 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41862 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlkAv-0001yL-7F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:59:01 -0400
Received: from mail-qy0-f190.google.com ([209.85.221.190]:36360)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MlkAu-0005uf-Pr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:59:00 -0400
Received: by qyk28 with SMTP id 28so97233qyk.28
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4AA9061B.3010003@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:58:51 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?
References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>	<20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>	<4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws>	<20090910070336.GD3351@amit-x200.redhat.com>	<20090910075644.GA6769@1und1.de>	<20090910100804.GA7992@amit-x200.redhat.com>
	<20090910084713.41dae0b4@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <20090910084713.41dae0b4@doriath>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:38:04 +0530
> Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>   
>>> - URL of staging tree
>>>       
>> Might help; but various developers might have their own staging trees
>> (as it now is). If things change in the future, this will have to be
>> modified.
>>     
>
>  I think he's talking about Anthony's staging, which is the most
> important one for those submitting patches.
>
>  I might be wrong about this but, the Linux kernel way of having
> people maintaining subsystems didn't work out here yet.
>   

I believe this is the long term solution but I do think our previous 
attempt wasn't successful.  As we do a better job isolating the 
subsystems and people get more familiar with the internal bits of QEMU, 
I believe we'll naturally migrate to this.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori