From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mlm9x-0007kX-4r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:06:09 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mlm9r-0007h4-BP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:06:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35906 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mlm9r-0007h0-7v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:06:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f177.google.com ([209.85.221.177]:33913) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlm9q-0006G3-PN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:06:02 -0400 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so8247qyk.18 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AA923E6.1010608@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:05:58 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained? References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws> <20090910070336.GD3351@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4AA90592.7080100@codemonkey.ws> <4AA90F7F.2030709@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4AA90F7F.2030709@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Amit Shah , Bernhard Kauer , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Avi Kivity wrote: > On 09/10/2009 04:56 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> The problem is patch volume. We often see hundreds of patches a >> day. If typing a mail for each patch takes 2 minutes, that's >> potentially hours spent just on sending these mails. >> > > You exaggerate. The average rate is 13 patches per calendar day. FYI, in the past 14 hours, there were 92 patches posted to the list. Regards, Anthony Liguori