From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MlmHr-0006eX-5W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:14:19 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MlmHk-0006Z2-Vx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:14:17 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48621 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlmHk-0006Yu-NM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:14:12 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:29806)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1MlmHj-0008NP-LK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:14:12 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1MlmHj-0004Fm-0e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:14:11 -0400
Message-ID: <4AA925E9.1010700@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:14:33 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?
References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>	<20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>	<4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws>	<20090910070336.GD3351@amit-x200.redhat.com>
	<4AA90592.7080100@codemonkey.ws> <4AA90F7F.2030709@redhat.com>
	<4AA923E6.1010608@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4AA923E6.1010608@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>, Bernhard Kauer <kauer@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 09/10/2009 07:05 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 09/10/2009 04:56 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> The problem is patch volume.  We often see hundreds of patches a 
>>> day.  If typing a mail for each patch takes 2 minutes, that's 
>>> potentially hours spent just on sending these mails.
>>>
>>
>> You exaggerate.  The average rate is 13 patches per calendar day.
> FYI, in the past 14 hours, there were 92 patches posted to the list.

Only 4 or 5 patchsets though.  It's not that much effort to ack when 
committing.  And of course, the average is way lower and I expect it to 
drop as the code base matures.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.