From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
dlaor@redhat.com, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/5] Refactor and enhance RTC configuration
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:36:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AAE46DF.5070205@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AAD119F.2000107@web.de>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Dor Laor wrote:
>
>> I'm in favor of sticking to clock=vm as a default.
>> Most chances that the guest will have internet connect and the host (ala
>> rom hypervisor) won't have.
>>
Default behaviors only really matter for unmanaged environments. An
isolated hypervisor in a rom is most certainly a managed environment.
As long as there is the ability to do clock=vm, setting clock=host by
default should be fine.
> Except for Jamie's case of extending some license runtime, I really see
> no real use for RTC based on vm_clock anymore. There is some reason why
> other RTCs are already based on the host clock.
>
In general, behaving like real hardware by default and supporting odd
use-cases with additional options seems like a good policy to me.
> Jan
>
--
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-14 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 15:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Refactor and enhance RTC configuration Jan Kiszka
2009-09-09 15:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] Introduce QEMU_CLOCK_HOST Jan Kiszka
2009-09-09 15:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] win32: Drop dead dyntick timer code Jan Kiszka
2009-09-09 15:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] Refactor RTC command line switches Jan Kiszka
2009-09-09 15:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] Rename QEMU_TIMER_* to QEMU_CLOCK_* Jan Kiszka
2009-09-09 15:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] Enable host-clock-based RTC Jan Kiszka
2009-09-09 15:40 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/5] Refactor and enhance RTC configuration Anthony Liguori
2009-09-09 16:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-09 16:41 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-09 18:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-09-09 17:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-09 20:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-09 20:18 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-09 22:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-11 8:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-13 15:08 ` Dor Laor
2009-09-13 15:37 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-14 13:36 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-09-14 15:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-09 17:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-09-10 10:41 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-09-09 17:33 ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-09 19:13 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AAE46DF.5070205@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).