From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnKO3-0000wp-MM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:51:07 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnKNz-0000wI-1e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:51:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33594 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnKNy-0000w8-Qi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:51:02 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f203.google.com ([209.85.211.203]:39323) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MnKNy-0002Gn-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:51:02 -0400 Received: by ywh41 with SMTP id 41so4733882ywh.19 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AAEC8CC.8030602@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:50:52 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] patchwork service. References: <200909142331.49181.jcd@tribudubois.net> In-Reply-To: <200909142331.49181.jcd@tribudubois.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jean-Christophe Dubois Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" Jean-Christophe Dubois wrote: > I know there is some discussion on how to get earlier feeback to people > submitting patches. > > It seems there already is a "patchwork" service available. > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/ > > But it is not used as the patch status is not updated for quite a few of them > (even if they have been accepted/merged since then). > I looked at the patchwork tooling and it didn't seem to easily integrate into my work flow. It seems to be designed with the idea that you use their tools to pull and manage patches. I don't think those tools will scale to the volume of patches qemu-devel sees though. Plus, there's no easy way to deal with the fact that other maintainers may not use it. Now there are a few thousand patches and trolling through would take ages. Not really sure how to best proceed. I'm open to suggestions. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > > >