From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnN0O-0000fZ-5Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:38:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnN0J-0000ac-ED for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:38:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37062 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnN0I-0000aH-Q1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:38:46 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f183.google.com ([209.85.211.183]:41589) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MnN0I-0002vw-GB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:38:46 -0400 Received: by ywh13 with SMTP id 13so5494158ywh.20 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AAEF023.4080009@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:38:43 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] patchwork service. References: <200909142331.49181.jcd@tribudubois.net> <4AAEC8CC.8030602@codemonkey.ws> <4AAEE220.8040706@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <4AAEE220.8040706@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jean-Christophe Dubois Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 15.09.2009 00:50, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Jean-Christophe Dubois wrote: >> >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/ >>> >>> But it is not used as the patch status is not updated for quite a few >>> of them (even if they have been accepted/merged since then). >>> >> I looked at the patchwork tooling and it didn't seem to easily >> integrate into my work flow. It seems to be designed with the idea >> that you use their tools to pull and manage patches. I don't think >> those tools will scale to the volume of patches qemu-devel sees >> though. Plus, there's no easy way to deal with the fact that other >> maintainers may not use it. Now there are a few thousand patches and >> trolling through would take ages. >> > > Note that there are scripts which can be placed in commit hooks and > automatically mark patches as applied if they were not changed between > submission and applying. > Can you point me in their direction? I'll take a look Regards, Anthony Liguori