From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MoMz2-0000Jd-C5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:49:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MoMyx-0000Ir-L6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:49:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54013 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MoMyx-0000Ij-AY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:49:31 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.221.173]:54874) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MoMyx-0003xd-01 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:49:31 -0400 Received: by qyk3 with SMTP id 3so392162qyk.4 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AB292C3.307@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:49:23 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Git repositories References: <3842A82A-EA9B-4470-A16A-236AD0081849@gmail.com> <20090917144440.188cf14e@doriath> <4AB281BB.6080404@codemonkey.ws> <1253215755.7425.6.camel@athens.parenthephobia.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1253215755.7425.6.camel@athens.parenthephobia.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Nathan Baum Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Nathan Baum wrote: > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 13:36 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Luiz Capitulino wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:00:06 -0400 >>> G 3 wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I was looking at the page Qemu.com and had a question. What is the >>>> different between the QEMU 0.10 Stable tree and the QEMU master >>>> repository? Which one do I want to apply patches to? >>>> >>>> >>> The stable tree only gets bug fixes and the master one is where >>> development takes place. >>> >>> >> The 0.10 stable tree is for the 0.10.x series which is now community >> supported. If you have a patch that applies to 0.10.x but not to >> master, then you should send a patch against that tree. >> > > A search of the list reveals that in February you said the repo on > Savannah would eventually be the official tree. Has that happened yet? > savannah's been the official tree for ages now. Regards, Anthony Liguori