From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MqYby-0007Q6-4D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:38:50 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MqYbs-0007Pi-M5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:38:48 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36400 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MqYbs-0007Pf-Fp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:38:44 -0400
Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.221.173]:47372)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MqYbs-0007P1-7J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:38:44 -0400
Received: by qyk3 with SMTP id 3so929315qyk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4ABA874D.9040801@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:38:37 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20090923155559.GA18203@redhat.com>
	<4ABA64E4.7070007@codemonkey.ws>
	<20090923193858.GD18947@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090923193858.GD18947@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu: tree for pci related fixes
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>, markmc@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, kraxel@redhat.com, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 01:11:48PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> I think it makes sense for everyone to keep their own trees and to make  
>> them publicly accessible.  However, for resends, I would still like them  
>> to occur on the mailing list.
>>     
>
> Okay I guess .. but why?
>   
Resends happen for one of two reasons.  Either I'm too slow and the 
sender is impatient or I've dropped the patch and not provided 
appropriate explanation.  I see both cases as a failure on my part and 
[RESEND] on the list gets my attention much better than having a git tree.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori