From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mr7qS-0001Tz-L8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:16:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mr7qH-0001S8-Nq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:16:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38143 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mr7qG-0001Rw-L1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:15:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24939) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mr7qG-0008Fl-3z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:15:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4ABC9815.4010007@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:14:45 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eepro100: Don't allow guests to fail assertions References: <1253720562-13104-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <4ABA62D3.6030900@mail.berlios.de> In-Reply-To: <4ABA62D3.6030900@mail.berlios.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 23.09.2009 20:02, schrieb Stefan Weil: > There are about 10 pending patches for eepro100.c, so the code at > savannah is > not a good base for new patches of eepro100.c. And there are even more > patches > in my queue to be sent as soon as the first 10 are integrated. On second thought, your 10+ patches are only for master, I assume? Then this patch should be applied in its current version to the stable branch(es). I'll still rebase for master, of course. Kevin