From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 1/3] net: macaddr tweaks.
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:24:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AC1D25D.3030608@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87my4ebsj9.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org>
>> +void qemu_macaddr_default_if_unset(macaddr_t macaddr)
>> +{
>> + macaddr_t zero = { 0,0,0,0,0,0 };
>> +
>> + if (memcmp(macaddr, zero, sizeof(zero)) != 0)
>> + return;
>> + macaddr[0] = 0x52;
>> + macaddr[1] = 0x54;
>> + macaddr[2] = 0x00;
>> + macaddr[3] = 0x12;
>> + macaddr[4] = 0x34;
>> + macaddr[5] = 0x56;
>> +}
>> +
>
> This will get us the same default MAC address for all NICs, won't it?
> The old code provides a different default for each NIC.
>
> Simply increment the default whenever it is used?
Would be an option. Doesn't fully match the old behavior though.
Old behavior is to use 0x56 + nic index (i.e. nd_table index) for the
last byte, so nic #1 allways has 0x57, no matter whenever for nic #0 a
default was specified or not.
The problem we have here is that the nics created via -device don't have
a nd_table entry and thus no nic index. We have a related issue with
pxe boot (-boot n,o,p,q == boot first,second,third,fourth nic).
Didn't have a good idea (yet) how to address that.
>> +typedef uint8_t macaddr_t[6];
>
> Reserved identifier (any POSIX header). Do we care?
We should prrobably qemu-ify it to something like MACAddr anyway.
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-29 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-25 19:43 [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 0/3] qdev-ify network cards Gerd Hoffmann
2009-09-25 19:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 1/3] net: macaddr tweaks Gerd Hoffmann
2009-09-28 22:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-09-29 9:24 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2009-09-30 11:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2009-09-30 17:19 ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-25 19:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 2/3] qdev: mac addr property fixups Gerd Hoffmann
2009-09-25 19:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 3/3] ne2k_isa: qdev-ify Gerd Hoffmann
2009-09-28 22:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 0/3] qdev-ify network cards Markus Armbruster
2009-09-30 7:20 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-09-30 9:07 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AC1D25D.3030608@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).