From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Msg3F-00034n-0f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:59:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Msg3A-0002yQ-MF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:59:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40255 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Msg3A-0002yA-GN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:59:40 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:35311) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MsfNN-0007gw-VY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:16:30 -0400 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.149]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MsdUn-0004OV-Kz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:16:01 -0400 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so1676934qwc.4 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:15:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AC21660.6020304@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:14:56 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4AB8DD53.7070806@redhat.com> <4AB8DECA.3090908@redhat.com> <4AB8E88C.4040103@redhat.com> <4AB980E6.2070203@codemonkey.ws> <4AB9AA8E.7060800@third-harmonic.com> <4AC1A49A.1010308@redhat.com> <20090929065856.GC25389@redhat.com> <4AC1B5CD.7050702@redhat.com> <20090929085450.GE25389@redhat.com> <4AC211C8.1060202@codemonkey.ws> <20090929140601.GA28733@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20090929140601.GA28733@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix virtio_blk serial pci config breakage List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: john cooper , john cooper , Rusty Russell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity , jens.axboe@oracle.com, Vadim Rozenfeld Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I don't think it's such a good idea. We want to keep exposing most of > config space in i/o bar because of backwards compatibility. And we want > to keep datapath operations such as vq kicks, in i/o space. > We can do feature negotiation in virtio-pci. That lets us continue exposing the first 246 bytes of the config space in PIO and guests can negotiate a second bar for access to larger config spaces. Regards, Anthony Liguori