From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt0TA-0004BS-Px for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:47:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt0T5-0004AN-Sr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:47:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38517 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt0T5-0004AE-KB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:47:47 -0400 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:51122) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mt0T3-0006u1-VI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:47:47 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8UEhX5G032009 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:43:33 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n8UElTH2097616 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:47:36 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n8UElPxv024543 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:47:25 -0600 Message-ID: <4AC36F7A.7030001@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:47:22 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com> <20090930051703.GE28188@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4AC35751.2090206@us.ibm.com> <20090930133715.GA8503@amit-x200.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20090930133715.GA8503@amit-x200.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Release plan for 0.12.0 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Amit Shah Cc: Rusty Russell , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , kvm-devel , Paul Brook Amit Shah wrote: > On (Wed) Sep 30 2009 [08:04:17], Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Amit Shah wrote: >> >>> On (Tue) Sep 29 2009 [18:54:53], Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> o multiport virtio-console support >>> >>> >> Assuming we can get the kernel drivers straightened out, I think it's >> certainly reasonable for 0.12. >> > > The kernel drivers are in fine shape. > I meant on track for including into the appropriate tree. Looking for an Ack/Nack from Rusty. That's been the general policy for all virtio changes btw. Nothing specific to virtio-console. > Amit > -- Regards, Anthony Liguori