From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt4WL-0001tS-Ew for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:07:25 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt4WG-0001m1-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:07:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54335 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt4WG-0001la-M2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:07:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33105) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mt4WG-0005EU-0I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:07:20 -0400 Message-ID: <4AC3AC65.7090809@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:07:17 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1254325401-18777-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Reorganize option rom (+linux kernel) loading. List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/30/09 21:03, Juan Quintela wrote: > Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >> + >> +static void rom_insert(const char *type, Rom *rom) > > You are not using the type parameter, Indeed. There was a debug message which used the type parameter. Guess it can be zapped now. > I guess that a field inside struct > Rom could make sense. I don't think so. What for? cheers, Gerd