From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt6IQ-0003Gw-KB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:01:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt6IM-0003F6-3k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:01:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60941 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt6IM-0003F3-1o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:01:06 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f214.google.com ([209.85.220.214]:57892) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mt6IL-0007DS-HY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:01:05 -0400 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so2194789fxm.8 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AC3C70C.4020002@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:01:00 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: CODING_STYLE (was Re: [PATCHv2] qemu: target library, use it in msix) References: <20090923200635.GA21246@redhat.com> <20090924191121.GB29419@redhat.com> <20090929161115.GA13885@redhat.com> <20090930135142.GA20378@redhat.com> <4AC38EA4.70700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Avi Kivity , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Blue Swirl wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 09/30/2009 03:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >>> So ... Linux kernel style wins? What do others think? >>> >>> >> Any change is going to cause a large amount of pain if implemented. >> > > True, but with 'indent' support the pain would be brief. > It's equivalent to losing a massive amount of revision history which hurts debugging. Regards, Anthony Liguori