From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MtFCK-0000W9-Q9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:31:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MtFCF-0000Rr-W7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:31:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39517 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MtFCE-0000RL-Si for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:31:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15869) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MtFCE-0008Ao-CQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:31:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4AC44CB4.8060006@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:31:16 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: CODING_STYLE (was Re: [PATCHv2] qemu: target library, use it in msix) References: <20090923200635.GA21246@redhat.com> <20090924191121.GB29419@redhat.com> <20090929161115.GA13885@redhat.com> <20090930135142.GA20378@redhat.com> <4AC38EA4.70700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" On 09/30/2009 07:29 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 09/30/2009 03:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >>> So ... Linux kernel style wins? What do others think? >>> >>> >> >> Any change is going to cause a large amount of pain if implemented. >> > True, but with 'indent' support the pain would be brief. > External trees (qemu-kvm, the Xen tree, distros which carry patches) will all have to adapt, just so that we can reach 80 columns twice as quickly. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.