From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MtP50-0005oe-46
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:04:34 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MtP4v-0005ji-Tg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:04:33 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52064 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MtP4v-0005jU-Qa
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:04:29 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17160)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1MtP4v-0003pF-97
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:04:29 -0400
Message-ID: <4AC4E112.1020709@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:04:18 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1241459088.26045.1.camel@lappy>	
	<1241513785-28738-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>	
	<1254257151.29022.11.camel@blaa>
	<20090930135144.GA29956@infradead.org>	
	<4AC36355.8040908@redhat.com> <1254319160.3105.67.camel@blaa>	
	<4AC4DDA7.9070708@redhat.com> <1254416426.2920.41.camel@blaa>
In-Reply-To: <1254416426.2920.41.camel@blaa>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] qemu-kvm: virtio-net: Re-instate GSO
 code removed upstream
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

On 10/01/2009 07:00 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 18:49 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>    
>> On 09/30/2009 03:59 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>>      
>>> I think we should keep the vlan stuff, just de-emphasise it.
>>>
>>>        
>> Maybe we should do what X.org does, break it silently and remove it some
>> time later when no one complains.
>>      
> Well, the 'silently' part isn't going to work now, is it?
>    

Me and my big mouth.

> Anyway, I'm sure at least Jan would notice if his 'dump' backend stopped
> working
>    

Patch it to use libpcap?

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.