From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MtT24-0002Gb-41 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:17:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MtT1z-0002Di-9x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:17:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32839 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MtT1z-0002DZ-3P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:17:43 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:41907) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MtT1y-0001xp-Sa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:17:43 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so205456fga.10 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:17:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AC51C70.2030006@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:17:36 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Commit 99a0949 (using the mailing list) List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc , Paul Brook Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" I've reverted 99a0949. It's not necessarily a bad change to make but something that's so invasive as that absolutely requires some discussion before hand. Avoiding "bike-shedding" is not a valid argument for avoiding the list. For instance, I find the naming to be truly awful and would have liked some discussion on a more reasonable naming convention. I have a very large set of patches in my queue (over 200) that I'm testing and trying to commit. A lot of other people do. If we're going to make a change like this, it's very important to coordinate with people so that they can flush their queues and avoid massive merge head-ache. Regards, Anthony Liguori