From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MuWeb-0001UW-BQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:21:57 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MuWeW-0001Qd-8F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:21:56 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36257 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MuWeW-0001QW-1e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:21:52 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com ([209.85.211.179]:50696)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MuWeV-0006bC-ON
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:21:51 -0400
Received: by ywh9 with SMTP id 9so2921000ywh.19
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4AC8F5CC.1070107@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:21:48 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20091004094033.GA16883@redhat.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0910041345420.2448@linmac.oyster.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910041345420.2448@linmac.oyster.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: commits not reported to qmu-commits?
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

malc wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi,
>> I'm subscribed to qmu-commits list. but I didn't get
>> mail about these commits:
>> 	commit c227f0995e1722a1abccc28cadf0664266bd8043
>> 	commit 99a0949b720a0936da2052cb9a46db04ffc6db29
>> Is this a problem on my side? Did others get it?
>>     
>
> Largeish commits are silently dropped.
>   

The list rejected them.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori