From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MunUT-0002gE-Lw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:20:37 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MunUO-0002ek-5k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:20:36 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52081 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MunUO-0002eh-3W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:20:32 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com ([209.85.211.179]:48873)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MunUN-0003Uc-QY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:20:31 -0400
Received: by ywh9 with SMTP id 9so3391651ywh.19
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4AC9F29B.5060404@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:20:27 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] eepro100: Remove unused device status
	entries
References: <1253360475-10671-1-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de>	<m3d45naqws.fsf@neno.mitica>
	<4AB4FF9C.80005@mail.berlios.de>
In-Reply-To: <4AB4FF9C.80005@mail.berlios.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@trasno.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Stefan Weil wrote:
> Personally, I prefer version numbers which express something, for example
> the date of a change (as in my case). If it helps, I promise to send a patch
> which sets the version number to 4 as soon as the rest of eepro100.c is ok.
>
> Antony, please take the patch for now as it is, because I won't send a
> new one
> just to change the version number.
>   

No, the version number is wrong.  It also shouldn't be a variable.  And 
since eepro100 was in the 0.11.0 release, we need support backwards 
compatibility appropriately.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Regards
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
>