From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvHGX-0004H3-VE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:08:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvHGT-0004G1-Ke for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:08:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35849 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MvHGT-0004Fy-DZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:08:09 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:60489) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MvHGS-0007dm-QX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:08:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4ACBB1B5.7010704@mail.berlios.de> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:08:05 +0200 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] CODING_STYLE: {} as in linux kernel References: <20091006190115.GA4768@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20091006190115.GA4768@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: QEMU Developers Michael S. Tsirkin schrieb: > Most people seem to hate using {} around sngle-statement blocks. > And code isn't consistent either way. So let's change our standard > to something most people like, and eliminate the pain source. > > Inconsistency is not an argument for or against {}. I don't like single statement blocks without {} because of my personal experience with all kinds of code standard variants. Please don't change the qemu standard, I like it as it is. Stefan Weil > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin >