From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvX6z-0007t9-0W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:03:25 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvX6u-0007oZ-0p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:03:24 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40393 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MvX6t-0007nu-JA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:03:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15974) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MvX6s-0001iX-UR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:03:19 -0400 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n97E3IXe015960 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:03:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4ACC9FA1.50003@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:03:13 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] virtio-console: Add a virtio-console bus, support for multiple ports References: <4AC46A7A.6030809@redhat.com> <20091001085620.GB8385@amit-x200.redhat.com> <20091001104843.GA12334@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4AC49D79.9070800@redhat.com> <20091007092519.GB29515@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4ACC6492.6010808@redhat.com> <20091007100641.GC29515@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4ACC7CA5.4030704@redhat.com> <20091007114257.GA22238@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4ACC9240.4040008@redhat.com> <20091007135301.GD22238@amit-x200.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20091007135301.GD22238@amit-x200.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Amit Shah Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/07/09 15:53, Amit Shah wrote: > On (Wed) Oct 07 2009 [15:06:08], Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > There should be some way of deprecating commands in qemu. Maybe in 1-2 > release cycles. Yes, we should think about that, especially as the qdev switch brings alot of changes here. > Oh; I was stuck at the earlier suggestion made by you: > > -device virtio-serial-pci,chardev=... > > which implies -device virtioconsole (with a port at id 0) > > and then someone also doing > > -virtioconsole ... > > which would end up creating another bus for this current backward compat > reason. Yes, mixing old and new style is good for surprises. Better avoid that ;) cheers, Gerd