From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mvtry-0004eX-0G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:21:26 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mvtrs-0004e5-N0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:21:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37906 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mvtrs-0004e2-J3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:21:20 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:36351) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mvtrs-0006W0-6R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:21:20 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1659459fga.10 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ACDF550.1020502@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:21:04 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Release plan for 0.12.0 References: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com> <200910081555.40897.jens@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200910081555.40897.jens@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jens Osterkamp Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel , Paul Brook Jens Osterkamp wrote: > On Wednesday 30 September 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> o VMState conversion -- I expect most of the pc target to be completed >> o qdev conversion -- I hope that we'll get most of the pc target >> completely converted to qdev >> o storage live migration >> o switch to SeaBIOS (need to finish porting features from Bochs) >> o switch to gPXE (need to resolve slirp tftp server issue) >> o KSM integration >> o in-kernel APIC support for KVM >> o guest SMP support for KVM >> o updates to the default pc machine type >> >> Please add to this list and I'll collect it all and post it somewhere. >> > > What about Or Gerlitz' raw backend driver ? I did not see it go in yet, or did > I miss something ? > The patch seems to have not been updated after the initial posting and the first feedback cycle. I'm generally inclined to oppose the functionality as I don't think it offers any advantages over the existing backends. Regards, Anthony Liguori