From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvuYk-0000GQ-PL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:05:38 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvuYg-0000AX-5m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:05:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40337 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MvuYf-0000AC-QD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:05:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42609) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MvuYe-0008AU-U0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:05:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4ACDFFB7.8000500@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:05:27 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] Add -kvm option References: <1254953315-5761-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1254953315-5761-2-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1254953315-5761-3-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1254953315-5761-4-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1254953315-5761-5-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1254953315-5761-6-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1254953315-5761-7-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1254953315-5761-8-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1254953315-5761-9-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1254953315-5761-10-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <4ACD1D92.8080607@us.ibm.com> <4ACDF233.3090500@redhat.com> <4ACDF5D2.2070408@codemonkey.ws> <4ACDF779.2040505@redhat.com> <4ACDF82B.4010200@codemonkey.ws> <4ACDF9FD.8060704@redhat.com> <4ACDFDB1.2020505@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4ACDFDB1.2020505@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Anthony Liguori , Gerd Hoffmann , Glauber Costa , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/08/2009 04:56 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> That's a bug in the userspace pit :) >> >> I'm worried about things like 'info pit' needing dual implementations. > > You mean info qdm? > > It'll Just Work. > I mean (qemu) info pit pit: counter 0x1234 period 0x3453 or something. >> Interesting idea. I think it'll be hairy even with a point-to-point >> net abstraction, but it's worth trying. > > Could be interesting trying to tie the e1000 to vhost-net performance > wise... I don't think there's much chance of that - e1000 places important registers (like interrupt disable) in BARs whereas virtio puts them in the ring. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function