From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MxLmd-0006zE-1B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MxLmZ-0006vU-7t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60813 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MxLmW-0006uh-Ge for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:48 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com ([209.85.221.179]:60879) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MxLmV-00063a-OO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:47 -0400 Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so12101668qyk.30 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AD33B73.3020808@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:21:39 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] save kvm-specific msrs over save/load References: <1254940513-7180-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1254940513-7180-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity Glauber Costa wrote: > Although we currently do not register a pvclock, there is no harm in saving the > values of the involved msrs. We'll just load an empty value. qemu-kvm, OTOH, > will make the correct use of it, so I think it is better to do it here, than > to augment the diff. > How does the cpu versioning match up with qemu-kvm? Has this gone into the qemu-kvm tree yet? We've already bumped the version once for the 0.12 release so it's not necessary to bump it again. Regards, Anthony Liguori