From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mxl6C-0006en-0b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:23:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mxl62-0006Nw-5i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:23:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54524 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mxl61-0006NL-Sm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:23:37 -0400 Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:7875) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mxl61-00060I-6D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:23:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4AD4B791.8030203@qualcomm.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:23:29 -0700 From: Max Krasnyansky MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] usb-linux: return USB_RET_STALL on -EPIPE References: <1255434008.1817.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4AD4849C.3000600@us.ibm.com> <1255449158.1679.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4AD4A51B.4080407@us.ibm.com> <1255450341.1679.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4AD4A943.60604@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4AD4A943.60604@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Paul Bolle , Mark Burkley , Anthony Liguori , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 10/13/2009 09:22 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Paul Bolle wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 11:04 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> Paul Bolle wrote: >>> >>>> Does it matter who actually signs off this patch? >>>> >>>> >>> Yes. >>> >> So a Signed-off-by tag provided by me won't do? >> > > A SoB is a statement of intent so if you feel you can contribute a SoB > is a decision for you to make. See Documentation/SubmittingPatches in > Linux for more details about the ramification of DCO. I guess I could've provided the Signed-off-by instead of Acked-by. In other words if you're ok with converting my Acked-By to Signed-off-by in the aforementioned patch then lets go ahead an do it. I could also resend the full patch but I'm totally swamped right now and might not get to doing it this week. btw Paul you can also resend and sign off yourself and keep my ack. Max